A post for organizing my thoughts on the inspirations and resources used for this website's design. Hopefully you find it useful as well.
Read more…lab notes: Brian
notebooks
Research Papers - These are mostly intended to be evergreen documents - expect updates. They will include standalone articles but also research for hardware projects, software, and site development.
Blogs - Short form content on various topics.
topics
- usl - ultrasciencelabs
- greymatter post archive
- drupal post archive
- the web
- web development
- models
- paper planes
lab notes: Brian
On the restoration and updating of a Drupal 4.7 based website recovered from archived backups.
I didn't keep great notes as I worked through this project and I did pretty minimal research - I was inspired to give it a go one day and I just went for it. So I'm doing my best to put a coherent work log together from memory.
Page is under construction, all content subject to change.
Read more…abstract
Many years ago (circa 1994, I think) I was gifted a Whitewings paper airplane assembly kit. Sadly, I don't know which volume, and I no longer have any of the planes, but I do recall one thing - they were a blast to fly.
Recently my kids started experimenting with paper airplanes, many folded from the excellent designs published by John Bringhurst in my copy of his work "Planes, Jets, and Helicopters" from 1993. However, most of the designs in that book while fun to fold and fly, don't work well out of doors. I remembered Whitewings planes from my youth and decided to pick up a couple of volumes to play with- they are very much "outdoor" planes.
Sadly, the vast majority of Whitewings designs are long out of print. The only new kits I can find carrying the name are paper and balsa kits designed for educational programs. The original all paper and paper and balsa kits can only be found as used (often partial or incomplete) or new old stock.
And there's the dilemma. Whitewings are made to be flown, not just collected. But cutting up your kits to build and fly paper planes that will inevitably be lost or destroyed in turn destroys your collection that may not be able to be replaced.
So, what to do? A bit of low-level piracy.1 Making high-quality digital copies that can be re-printed, re-cut, and re-flown. That part isn't terribly challenging these days. The true challenge is material selection. The original kits were printed on card stock - but what size? How about weight? Grain direction? Caliper? Finish texture? I suspect when Yasuaki Ninomiya designed the planes that would become Whitewings kits in the 70's there was some thought or care put into the material choice. But even if it was an afterthought, replicating the feel and performance of the original designs would depend on proper modern material replacements.
Read more…Search engines don't search.
At least not how we might want them to or how we may have grown up expecting them to. Just type "anyone else notice search results are useless?" into your favorite mainstream search engine (Google, Bing, Yahoo, etc...) and you'll get a bunch of hits ranging from Reddit posts to serious articles outlining the failings of modern search engines.
The issues are generally the same - SEO spam, intrusive ads, companies filtering or redirecting results to their own services and affiliates. And it's all being accelerated by AI - AI generated images, AI generated site content, AI filtered and interpreted results.
And it isn't your imagination, consider this TechSpot article by Alfonso Maruccia titled "New study confirms the obvious, search results are only getting worse". It outlines the results of a German study that spent a year tracking product review search results from three popular search tools - Google, Bing, and DuckDuckGo. Suffice to say, the results are not encouraging:
Popular search engines are losing the cat-and-mouse game against SEO-oriented spam, the German researchers say, while the line between "benign" content and worthless link farms has become increasingly blurry. The situation will only worsen with generative AI algorithms, which can be (ab)used to instantly eject a lot of low-quality, fact-free content that would be perfect for SEO spam and SERP manipulation.
The research team focused on product review searches, and per the article Google responded to the study saying that it doesn't reflect the overall "quality and helpfulness" of search results.
I disagree.
Read more…